home faq demo bizcase contact
Click a topic to display its content.
  • Statement of the Problem
  • A customer service center or call center in an insurance agency/company needs an efficient way to organize the large volume of information required to interact with clients and potential clients on the telephone. Requests, problems, and queries from a demanding customer base challenge the resources of even the most efficient insurance call centers. Most call centers use some type of hardcopy reference source, commonly referred to as a desk reference, but a hardcopy manual is difficult to update and keep consistent across all copies in use. As a result, operators resort to homegrown methods to help them communicate effectively with clients (cheat sheets, sticky notes) and, when all else fails, will seek an answer from colleagues or their team leader, leaving the caller on hold.

    This lack of efficient information retrieval diminishes the quality of the customer’s experience as well as that of the operator. It can cost a company in decreased employee production, lost business, and, worse case, legal fees incurred when defending an errors and omissions suit.

  • Needs analysis—common problems
  • The following table illustrates the problems most insurance companies have with their current method of storing, retrieving, and maintaining the information their customer service representatives (CSRs) need to answer customer calls.

    Current Problem Needs Analysis
    • Information overloads the user; kitchen-sink approach requires users to wade through emails, whole rate manuals, and other data-laden information to find an answer
    • Users must be able to predict where a data item is located, drill down quickly to access the page containing the data, and scan immediately to the data
    • Users need to be able to visually predict where a piece of information will be on the screen
    • Extraneous information must be eliminated
    • Information is inaccessible; users can’t find it
    • Users need various portals (access points) to information depending on their workflow. For example, a sales associate needs comparative data across providers whereas a CSR needs specific provider information relative to the state in which a customer resides
    • Users need to be able to search the system so that they are not required to guess the author’s index terms or keywords
    • Information is unreliable; data may appear in several different documents and be different in each one
    • Data must reside only in one place so that changes to information need only be made once
    • Only one person is capable of updating the system; when she is absent, upgrades are not made until she returns; information is not timely
    • System needs to be easily updatable, preferably by people requiring minimal special training
    • Users need a way to quickly notify Administrator when they spot erroneous information or information requiring an update
    • Current system may already be online, but users get lost and disoriented; only way to recover is to repeatedly click the Back button or to close the system and reopen it
    • System must be easy to navigate and allow users to quickly move between files and be able to return to where they want to be
    • Users often are not familiar with corporate jargon and abbreviations
    • System must be able to explain unfamiliar terminology without disrupting the user’s flow of information retrieval
  • Needs analysis—available options
  • Until development of the 3-Click Desk Reference, insurance companies had only a couple options, neither of which successfully addresses the problems outlined above:

    Options Advantages Disadvantages
    • Customer resolution management software and knowledge management databases
    • Systems function as warehouses for large bodies of knowledge, such as claims processing and generating quotations.
    • Costly to design, implement, and maintain
    • Hogs computer resources, making it difficult to run concurrent with other applications
    • Requires significant training to operate
    • Not designed to manage the daily information that CSRs require
    • Not the right tool for the job
    • Intranet quick-reference pages and other internally generated, print or online information handbooks
    • Low-cost
    • Paper manuals are hard to maintain and use
    • Rarely any consistency of information
    • Data is often inaccurate
    • Difficult to have one person responsible for content
    • No consistency or predictability across information
    • Not the right tool for the job
  • Cost and benefit analysis—measurable savings from increased efficiency
  • Saving 3 little minutes per call saves thousands of dollars per month.

    Assumptions*
     
    without 3-Click
    with 3-Click
    Agent salary/year
    Company overhead per agent/year
    $28,000
    $49,500
    Avg call duration (minutes)
    6 minutes
    3 minutes
    Agent capacity (calls/month)
    1,087
    2,174
    Average cost per call
    $5.94
    $2.97

    *From a white paper written by Sail Labs Speech Technology citing the 1999 Call Center Benchmark Report, Purdue University Center for Customer Driven Quality.

    Explanation: At 90% efficiency an agent works for .9×6.5 hours = 351 minutes per 8-hour shift. Assuming a call duration of 6 minutes, an agent can handle 58.5 calls per day on average or, over the 223 working days in a year, 13,045 calls per year. However, when the average call duration is reduced to 3 minutes, that same agent can handle 117 call per day or 26,091 call per year.

    The cost per call is derived by adding together the agent's annual salary with the company's overhead for an agent for a year ($28,000 + $49,500 = $77,500) and dividing the result by the number of calls the agent can make in a year.

    After purchasing the 3-Click Desk Reference, a call center can potentially make an additional 1,087 calls per month per operator. The average cost per call decreases from $5.94 to $2.97, or a savings of $2.97 per call. 1,087 calls per month multiplied by $2.97 saved per call equals $3,228.39 saved per operator per month. With 15 agents using the 3-Click system, the savings skyrockets to $48,425.85 per month. The recovery ratio per week is $12,106.46 per week at 4 weeks per month.

    If this insurance agency or company originally invested $15,000 in the development of their 3-Click Desk Reference, it will take them less than two weeks to recover their investment.

    If this agency or company does not have sufficient call volume to realize such a substantial increase in efficiency, then it is possible that the number of operators can be reduced. The savings generated from a conservative 25% reduction in employee salary overhead (3 operators, for example) will result in a savings of 3 × $77,500 = $232,500 per year (or $19,375 per month). Again, an initial investment of $15,000 to develop their 3-Click Desk Reference will pay for itself in under 30 days.

  • Cost and benefit analysis—difficult-to-measure savings
  • Here are some additional considerations you might make when evaluating the cost of purchasing the 3-Click Desk Reference. These costs are difficult to quantify without knowing your company’s specific data and are presented here for you to expand upon when designing your own business case.

    1. The cost of inefficient customer service and putting customers on hold

      KANA, an industry leader in providing solutions for Service Resolution Management (SRM), conducted a survey in which customers indicated they value prompt attention on the phone, quick responses to questions, and friendly staff above all other concerns. KANA’s research demonstrates the importance of technologies that enable CSRs to resolve any query, regardless of its complexity, while customers are on the line. (KANA March 15, 2005, http://www.kana.com/)

    2. The costs-savings from reducing training costs

      There is no industry benchmark that pinpoints the average costs of training a call center operator, but a common ratio in the industry is that training amounts to 2% of payroll costs. (Intulogy, “Is Your Training Plan Keeping Pace With New Technology?” March 28, 2000. http://www.intulogy.com/good-reading/call-center-training-plan.html)

      The average call center operator training is 15 days. Currently, average agent compensation stands at US$ 32,000 per year (roughly $16/hour). The average cost to hire a new agent is US$ 6,500. The average cost for recruiting and training a call center representative is anything between US$ 5,000 and US$ 18,000. (Sail Labs, “Conversational Systems in Call Centers,” May 18, 2001. http://www.sail-technology.com)

      To put these figures into a meaningful perspective, let’s say that you can reduce operator training by 8 hours when using the 3-Click Desk Reference instead of requiring new operators to learn volumes of minutia that they can't possibly remember. $16/hour x 8 hours = $128 per employee savings in direct training costs. And don't forget the indirect training costs savings of reduced training room and trainer requirements.

    3. The cost (in money and perhaps even in goodwill) of fixing mistakes

      Fixing mistakes in this business is more about customer retention than it is dollars. If you have to rewrite a policy because an underwriting rule was not up-to-date, you may lose the client altogether. Insurance companies know that customer retention is where the profit lies and it can’t be measured. How many customers do you lose if you make mistakes? That’s not really the correct question to ask. Here’s a better one: How many potential customers will you lose as a result of one unhappy customer? A rule of thumb is that if you give bad service to one client, 100 other people are eventually told about it.

    4. The cost of errors and omissions

      The cost of an error and omissions claim against your insurance company can fall anywhere between the amount of your deductible, millions of dollars of awarded damages, or perhaps losing your entire business. As an insurance professional, you know that the cost of insurance increases when claims are made against the policy. If your company must defend an E&O claim—or worse, must defend more than one—your company may become uninsurable or may no longer be able to afford the E&O coverage that remains available to you.

home faq demo bizcase contact